Update: North American Union Plans Denied in Argument over Semantics


WorldNetDaily.com reports that congressmen are beginning to do their own research on reports of a proposed “North American Union“, or Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
At a House committee meeting Wednesday, questioning of Jeffrey N. Shane, undersecretary of transportation for policy at the U.S. Department of Transportation, quickly dissolved into a matter of semantics.
The result was the same when White House Press Secretary Tony Snow was questioned on the existence of a North American Union aka Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
How can the American people get past this argument over semantics? Fortunately, it seems at least a few congressmen are not going to let government officials off the hook so easily.
Keep an eye on WorldNetDaily.com for updates on the topic.
Posted in General, National Sovereignty, Politics in General, Property Rights, Taxes | 3 Comments »
February 4th, 2007 at 11:26 am
I’m sorry, but the “North American Union” freak-outs by conservatives are as ridiculous as the “9-11 was an inside job” ravings by the moonbats. Unless you think the “One World Goverment” really is tracking you with black helicopters, including this drivel just makes you blog, and by extension Idaho conservatives, look silly.
March 7th, 2007 at 1:38 pm
[...] Previous posts containing excellent links on the subject include “The North American Union: Coming to a Country Near You“, “Congress Waking Up to North American Union?” and “Update: North American Union Denied in Argument Over Semantics“. [...]
March 30th, 2007 at 9:02 pm
[...] The Idaho House in Opposition, Crapo and Simpson: The North American Union Comes Home to Idaho, Update: North American Union Plans Denied in Argument Over Semantics, Congress Waking Up to “North American Union”?, The North American Union: Coming to a [...]