TrishAndHalli.com

Where we bring you fresh opinions on Idaho government, observations on life in general, great recipes, and an opportunity to comment on them all!

RSS Feeds, Etc.

Get New Posts Via Email! Enter your e-mail address and hit the 'Subscribe' button. Your address will never be sold or spammed.

About

Profile TrishAndHalli.com
Where we bring you fresh opinions on Idaho government, great recipes, and an opportunity to comment on them!.

Archives

Categories

Pages

Blogroll

Conservative News

General Interest

Idaho Falls Links

Idaho Politics

Left-Leaning Idaho

Libertarian Links

Pro-life Organizations


Jerry Sproul, CPA
ThoughtfulConsideration.com

Please take a moment to visit our sponsors!

The Idaho Supreme Court: Appointment vs. Election, Part II

April 26th, 2007 by Halli

In Part I, the Idaho Judicial Council and the process for appointing or electing a justice to the Idaho Supreme Court was discussed. Read Part I here.

Two of the attorneys vying for the soon-to-be-vacant seat on the Idaho Supreme Court are Bart Davis, senate majority leader in the Idaho Senate, and Marvin Smith, in private practice in Idaho Falls.

Bart Davis has long voiced his opinion that Supreme Court justices should be appointed. But denying voters a voice in the selection isn’t the only reason he would like to be considered for the position. He would love the prestige and responsibility without the effort of the campaign.

Davis claims he hates elections. He is, as he likes to remind everyone within earshot, just a little country lawyer. Every two years when he must campaign for his senate seat, he finds an opportunity (always in front of the news camera) to put his arm around his opponent (never a serious contender), and smile sadly to show how much it will pain him to win. An appointment to the Supreme Court would save him the rigors of a campaign, something for which he has no stomach.

And Marvin Smith has already had a shot a judgeship. He served as a district judge in Idaho Falls for a short period of time, but soon stepped down, saying it just wasn’t for him. Should he be appointed, would Smith soon tire of the Supreme Court routine? It would seem risky at best to give him the opportunity to find out.

I am unfamiliar with the other candidates, but their eagerness to be appointed rather than elected to the position categorically disqualifies them, in my opinion.

In conclusion, the constitution of the State of Idaho actually specifies that Supreme Court justices will be elected, and makes no provision for their appointment. Once again the Idaho Judicial Council, and specifically Gerald Schroeder, have succeeded in circumventing the voters, under the pretext of “keeping politics out of the judiciary”.

The only consolation is that in 1-½ years, whoever is appointed will face the ballot box.

If you enjoyed this article, consider subscribing to the full-feed RSS.

Posted in Constitutional Issues, Idaho Legislature, Politics in General | No Comments »

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Copyright © 2oo6 by TrishAndHalli.com Powered by Wordpress          
Ported by ThemePorter - template by Design4 | Sponsored by Cheap Web Hosting