Comments on: Guest Post: Parker v. DC Revisited http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/ Where we bring you fresh opinions on Idaho government, observations on life in general, great recipes, and an opportunity to comment on them all! Sat, 29 May 2010 08:15:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: G. A. Reimann http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-19863 G. A. Reimann Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:54:49 +0000 http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/#comment-19863 ctdonath: Many thanks for the heads-up on the refusal to partially lift the stay. I figured it would take a week or more to get a response. Will change my article to reflect the new information. Thanks ctdonath:
Many thanks for the heads-up on the refusal to partially lift the stay. I figured it would take a week or more to get a response.

Will change my article to reflect the new information.

Thanks

]]> By: ctdonath http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-19684 ctdonath Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:18:20 +0000 http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/#comment-19684 Re: “no response from the District or the Court is available.” As of this morning, DC Circuit Court has ruled the stay will NOT be partially lifted: http://dcguncase.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/dc-circuit-order-denying-motion-to-lift-stay.pdf Upshot: Heller, the only plaintiff currently with standing, only asked about handguns - not shotguns/rifles - and thus is not in a position to make a request not involving handguns. Also, for several reasons the court sees that the "functional gun ban" issue may be raised at the Supreme Court level. The stay stays. Re: “no response from the District or the Court is available.”

As of this morning, DC Circuit Court has ruled the stay will NOT be partially lifted:
http://dcguncase.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/dc-circuit-order-denying-motion-to-lift-stay.pdf

Upshot: Heller, the only plaintiff currently with standing, only asked about handguns – not shotguns/rifles – and thus is not in a position to make a request not involving handguns. Also, for several reasons the court sees that the “functional gun ban” issue may be raised at the Supreme Court level. The stay stays.

]]> By: ctdonath http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-19683 ctdonath Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:08:26 +0000 http://www.trishandhalli.com/2007/09/25/constitutional-issues/guest-post-parker-v-dc-revisited/#comment-19683 Re: "no response from the District or the Court is available." DC has responded: http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/DC%20gun%20reply%20CA%209-24-07.pdf Re: “no response from the District or the Court is available.”

DC has responded: http://www.scotusblog.com/movabletype/archives/DC%20gun%20reply%20CA%209-24-07.pdf

]]>