Where we bring you fresh opinions on Idaho government, observations on life in general, great recipes, and an opportunity to comment on them all!

RSS Feeds, Etc.

Get New Posts Via Email! Enter your e-mail address and hit the 'Subscribe' button. Your address will never be sold or spammed.


Where we bring you fresh opinions on Idaho government, great recipes, and an opportunity to comment on them!.





Conservative News

General Interest

Idaho Falls Links

Idaho Politics

Left-Leaning Idaho

Libertarian Links

Pro-life Organizations

Jerry Sproul, CPA

Please take a moment to visit our sponsors!

David Ripley: Stealth Liberal Seeks Supreme Court Seat

May 1st, 2010 by Halli

Idaho Chooses Life

District Judge John Bradbury is challenging incumbent Justice Roger Burdick in the May Primary Election for a seat on Idaho’s Supreme Court.

Bradbury very narrowly lost a similar bid in 2008, challenging Justice Joel Horton in that race. (As you read on … give thanks for the bullet we narrowly missed).

There are interesting – indeed, disturbing – backstories to Bradbury’s quest for higher office.

Part of that story is the very unusual lawsuit he has pending against the Idaho Supreme Court in federal court, because it had the audacity to require that he live in the judicial district over which he presides – a requirement laid out in Idaho Code. It seems Judge Bradbury doesn’t much care to live in Grangeville, and prefers to remain in Lewiston.

After being ordered to move to Grangeville, Bradbury sued the Supreme Court in federal court. Judge Lynn Winmill struck down his lawsuit. Bradbury has an appeal pending before the 9th Circuit.

It seems his back-to-back campaign(s) for the Supreme Court is driven by a mixture of ambition and revenge against the high court. That is a bit disturbing.

What is most important, however, is to realize that Judge Bradbury has a rather long political history.

In the early 1990’s John Bradbury sought a seat in the Idaho legislature as a Democrat. During his first quest in May of 1991, Bradbury wanted a nomination from the Democrat Central Committee. He told his fellow Democrats that he was “pro-Life” on abortion. For whatever reason, he failed to get the seat.

Less than a year later, he challenged incumbent Democrat Representative Chuck Cuddy in a primary. By this time, apparently, his views on the most important moral issue of our time had “evolved”. He was now a “woman’s right to choose” kind of guy.

Bradbury told the Lewiston Tribune (05.15.92), “I personally think forcing women to have children they don’t want won’t stop abortions.” In a later interview (05.23.92), he explained to this same paper that his views had “evolved” to the point where he sought, and earned, the endorsement of “Freedom Means Choice” in that primary election.

On many levels, John Bradbury seems to be a dangerous candidate for the state’s highest court.

Justice Burdick appears to be a temperate, conservatively-inclined member of the court – though we cannot absolutely declare him to be “pro-Life” in his moral and judicial philosophy. All we can say with certainty is that pro-Life Idahoans need to make darn certain that Bradbury does not win a seat on the Supreme Court, packing the ACLU’s agenda under his robes.

If you enjoyed this article, consider subscribing to the full-feed RSS.

Posted in Guest Posts, Idaho Pro-Life Issues | 1 Comment »

One Response

  1. Charlemagne Says:

    I am a conservative pro-life member of the Idaho Values Alliance but I am supporting Judge John Bradbury in this race. I have researched Idaho’s legal system at length and it has serious problems. Amongst these the widespread practice of Idaho’s judges to resign early to allow their successors to be initially appointed rather than elected(as provided in Idaho’s State Constitution and statutes. A judicial discipline system that is overly secretive and non functional (Idaho has one of the very worst records of disciplining judges for misconduct in the entire country. And a system that treats judges like they are infallible demi-gods.
    As a two time member of the Idaho Judicial Council Roger Burdick was part of this.It is interesting to note that the Judaical Council files formal charges against judges at the rate of one out of every 1000 complaints and the case against judicial critic John Bradbury just happens to b e that one of those hyper rare cases! So the real concern was not where John lived but that he had criticized the State Judiciary.
    There is more that I can say and more than a few horror stories about a judiciary that is out of control! To put it briefly, as things now stand Idaho has the Rule of Judges instead of the Rule of Law!I hope other pro-life conservatives join me and support Judge John Bradbury for the Idaho Supreme Court.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.

Copyright © 2oo6 by Powered by Wordpress          
Ported by ThemePorter - template by Design4 | Sponsored by Cheap Web Hosting